Every corner of the internet has something to say about AI. Some think AI is the best thing since the printing press; others think it will be the death of humanity.
For me, the truth is somewhere in between.
Although I see how AI can turn robots into killing machines, I also see the good it could do in the world.
Yes, some level of skepticism is warranted when dealing with a technology that could become our overlord, like Skynet.
However, the way people fight AI is reaching a point of concern.
Let me tell you about the current wave of AI derangement syndrome.
What is AI derangement syndrome?
AI derangement syndrome is a condition in which an individual is so worried about the unfair application of artificial intelligence that they’d go to extra lengths to discredit it.
That extra mile leads to a dark chasm of denial, where every bright idea has to be viewed through a microscope of skepticism.
A common manifestation of AI derangement syndrome is in online forums. Under every video, you’ll see a comment like “This looks like AI”.
In academia, professors are in a heightened state of paranoia. Any properly written essay is under threat of getting flagged for plagiarism.
The creative arts are experiencing an existential crisis due to mistrust and cynicism surrounding modern AI solutions like Sora.
Is there a case for AI derangement?
Don’t get me wrong, I understand why people are worried about AI ruining the integrity of human endeavor and creativity.
Nobody wants to find out that the video they like is AI-generated—or that the beautiful piece of writing they love was a ChatGPT output.
It feels wrong. It feels like you’ve been conned.
This sentiment extends to AI-written text.
During a recent Twitter discussion, Paul Graham refused to acknowledge that humans could use such words as “delve” naturally.
My point here is not that I dislike "delve," though I do, but that it's a sign that text was written by ChatGPT. pic.twitter.com/2i3GUgynuL
— Paul Graham (@paulg) April 7, 2024
He shared a probability graph as proof that AI is more likely to use “delve” than humans.
I understand Graham’s point: verbosity and the use of non-natural language are indicators of AI-created text.
Ignoring these signs will encourage people to con you with low-effort content and sales pitches, especially for investors.
If you found out that Stephen King generated his best books using AI prompts, it’d probably diminish the value of the final product.
This skepticism is an excellent guardrail for protecting the integrity of art and human creation by filtering out con artists and posers looking to make a quick buck.
However, I think Paul Graham’s staunch resistance to seeing why people from former British colonies could use a flowery vocabulary is a problem.
If the people in the upper echelons of tech are this cynical about language, then human creativity and communication are in deep trouble.
Potential impacts of AI derangement syndrome
Aggressively fighting AI content will drive you into a state of paranoia. You’ll second-guess every half-decent idea that makes it to your table.
It also makes people obsessive and elitist about language. If you don’t write using simple words, then your genius must be fuelled by artificial intelligence.
And this leads to the destruction of language. With Hemingway’s blunt, direct writing style becoming the new canon, descriptive writers like Virginia Wolf will become outdated.
The Hemingway style takes time to master, but making it the standard will kill written communication.
What does that mean for English learners raised on classic literature and proper grammar?
All ESL (English as a second language) people would have to simplify their writing. This sounds like a good idea on the surface but is a nightmare in practice.
People who have learnt English in the countries which have British colonial past – this is exactly how we learnt English.
— Osho, ओशो (@oshosidhant) April 8, 2024
'Delve' is a normal word which we speak.
There is no sense of what word is archaic/out of fashion and what's not!
Often times when I speak English with…
Being deranged about AI also opens the door to fake detection experts, who’d always justify their hourly pay by pointing out phantom AI-generated content.
But it’s not all dire. AI derangement can also improve how people communicate.
In most countries, ‘corporatespeak’ will become taboo. Managers and founders will simplify communication, which I think will help cut through jargon-filled word salads.
Government and legal institutions will make legal verbiage accessible to ordinary people. Academic institutions will also need to adjust the language to meet the needs of modern audiences.
How to avoid AI derangement syndrome
Take everything with a pinch of salt, but don’t give in to cynical AI derangement syndrome.
Accept that people communicate differently
Don’t shun formulaic writing with words like “this sounds like ChatGPT”. ChatGPT doesn’t speak. ChatGPT doesn’t have any original ideas.
Remember that before ChatGPT, humans were
ChatGPT output comes from the entire database of human knowledge connected to the internet. So, ChatGPT sounds like humans, not the other way around.
"Delve' is not a fancy word. It's one syllable. It's been used continuously for 6000 years. It's a word a child would know. Shakespeare used it.
— Lewis Campbell (@LewisCTech) April 12, 2024
This is unacceptable for an educated native English speaker. https://t.co/WbKfdrhX0T
Schools need to encourage simple communication
Teachers need to deal with the Frankenstein monster they created. Growing up, teachers graded essays by the number of “big” words you used.
“Conflagration” ranked higher than “fire”. “Inflammation” scored higher than “swelling”.
"Bad writers, and especially scientific, political and sociological writers, are nearly always haunted by the notion that Latin or Greek words are grander than Saxon ones" – George Orwell
— Lewis Campbell (@LewisCTech) April 13, 2024
There's also this, from Nineteen Eighty-Four: pic.twitter.com/baUNP5Uww5
Judge the work by its merit, not the language
The best scientific discoveries were translated from other languages to highfalutin English jargon, and it worked for everyone. So, instead of focusing on the language, judge the validity of the content.
Accept that not everyone can express ideas in simple English
From my experience working in Eastern Europe, most companies pay for translation services because they don’t trust their English grammar. Some use ChatGPT to bridge this gap.
Should we be worried about AI?
Artificial intelligence might hammer the death nail on some aspects of human life, but before joining the all-out crusade against this technology, try to understand how it helps others.
Don’t pay attention to industry experts rallying against AI. Once the tech becomes unbeatable, they’d be the first to hop on the bandwagon.
We’ve already seen startups springing up around AI content humanization and undetectable AI content creation.
No matter what you think about AI in writing and other human endeavors, the genie has left the bottle. Adapt or die.
How RoninPoint can improve your writing
RoninPoint provides a squad of qualified writers specialized in diverse industries, including technology, software development, healthcare, and eLearning.
Our writers are skilled in deploying SEO marketing strategies within content to improve your brand’s visibility online.
If you’re tired of recycled, boring ChatGPT content and seeking a fresh voice, let us write for you. Your word, your voice.
Who wrote this?
Ugochukwu Ezenduka writes about technology with the flair of a fiction writer for Ronin Point and other companies. He knows his way around JavaScript, ReactJS, and other programming languages. With a Master's Degree in Engineering, Ugochukwu has the chops and experience to break down complex concepts in digestible language. When he is not writing about tech, you can find Ugochukwu kicking a football or traveling with his camera.
